Skip to content
CREDIT WORK ROUTING

Who gets this application, and why.

SCREDIT routes each application to the team and the analyst who should own it, weighs who is actually loaded rather than who has the fewest files, and keeps a record of why it landed where it did.

THE PROBLEM

Work lands by habit, and nobody can say why.

Applications get picked up by whoever opens the queue first, or they go to the analyst who always handles that customer until the day they are on leave. Nobody can answer why a file sat for three days, or why one analyst is drowning while another is clear. The routing rule exists — it just lives in people's heads, so it cannot be reviewed, changed, or explained.

CAPABILITIES

What SCREDIT delivers

Routing on Your Rules

Send work to the right desk by the things that actually decide ownership: customer, exposure band, region, product line, or risk rating. The rule is written down once instead of re-decided every morning.

Load Measured Honestly

An overdue file is not the same weight as one that arrived this morning, and a high-priority review is not the same as a routine one. Work distributes by real burden rather than a headcount split.

Why This Analyst

Every routing decision keeps the rule that fired and the candidates that were considered. When someone asks why they got the file — or why they did not — there is an answer on the record.

Rebalancing When a Desk Drifts

When one analyst pulls well ahead of the queue, work can move rather than waiting for someone to notice. You set how far apart the desks have to get before anything shifts.

Routing on Submission

An application that arrives complete does not wait to be triaged before it starts moving. Assignment happens on submit, so the clock starts on the work rather than on the inbox.

Changed Without a Release

Reorganise a team, add a region, change how heavily overdue work counts — these are settings, not a development request. The routing policy keeps up with the organisation.

IN THE PRODUCT

The queue, in the product

The SCREDIT work console. A left navigation lists Credit Applications, Limit Reviews and Trade References with outstanding counts. Cards show a personal queue of seven with one overdue, two due today and four decisions committed. Team cards show a queue of twelve, SLA compliance at 94 per cent and two critical signals. An overdue panel names one application nineteen hours past its window, and an activity feed lists recent submissions, bureau pulls and approvals with the analyst who acted on each.
Work console — the queue, who owns each file, and what is past its windowSCREDIT demo environment · illustrative data, not a customer
The SCREDIT assignment panel on a credit application. It names the analyst who owns the file, the queue it sits in, when it was assigned, when the review is due, and which routing rule placed it there. Controls beneath re-run the routing engine against current policy or reassign to a named reviewer. A history list records each assignment in turn, the queue it moved from and to, and the reason the rule fired — here a move from the standard queue to the expedited queue on exposure band.
Assignment and routing — who owns the file, which rule placed it there, and what moved itSCREDIT demo environment · illustrative data, not a customer
OUTCOMES

What changes on the desk

No File Waits for a Human Triage Step

Work is owned from the moment it arrives instead of sitting in a shared queue.

Load That Reflects Reality

Distribution accounts for overdue and high-priority work, not just how many files each person has open.

An Answer to "Why Me?"

Routing decisions are on the record, so ownership disputes are settled by the system rather than by seniority.

A Policy You Can Actually Change

When the team changes, the routing changes the same afternoon.

Frequently asked questions

How is this different from a shared queue everyone picks from?

A shared queue optimises for whoever is fastest to click, which is not the same as whoever should own the file. Routing assigns ownership up front using your rules, so the customer with a $2M exposure does not get picked up by whoever happened to be free, and no file sits unclaimed because everyone assumed someone else had it.

What stops routing from overloading one analyst?

Load is measured before work is placed, and not simply by counting open files. Overdue and high-priority items count for more than routine ones, because they cost more attention. If a desk still drifts ahead, a rebalance can move work — and you set how large the gap has to be before that happens, so the system is not reshuffling ownership every hour.

Can an analyst or manager override where something went?

Yes. Routing produces a starting point, not a cage. A manager can reassign, and the reassignment is recorded alongside the original routing decision, so the history shows both what the policy said and what a human decided instead.

What happens when someone is on leave or leaves the company?

Because ownership is expressed as a policy rather than a habit, work stops depending on a specific person being present. Team membership changes take effect on the next routing decision, and existing work can be rebalanced across the remaining desks instead of sitting in an inbox nobody is reading.

Do we need development help to change how work is routed?

No. The routing policy and the weightings behind it are configuration, held in the system and changed by an administrator. Reorganising desks, adding a region, or deciding overdue work should count more heavily are all same-day changes, not release-cycle changes.

Does routing apply to collections work as well as new applications?

The same principle applies wherever work has to be owned by someone: assignment is recorded, load is accounted for, and the reason is kept. New credit applications are the clearest case because the clock starts the moment one is submitted.

See how work would route in your credit team.

Bring how your desks are split today — by customer, region, or exposure — and see it expressed as a routing policy, including what happens when someone is on leave.